Discover

About Our Vision of the perfect/”imperfect” nature

Perfect as a logical paradox and “imperfect” as an absurd or “imposible” of the illusion and shadow virtual, compared with, or compared or reported with marks, situations and systems of reference. Differently said (the unconventional of different as notdifferent or different/extradifferent) where (place or time, by case) and when (space or time, by case) knowing nature is neither laic/teist science nor laic/teist humane, in the classical or unconventional sense. Knowing represents the empiric of the logic nature’s experiences as a paradox of any content or body, etc. Including as a humanoid, because man is not and cannot be just the idea of man in the classical sense but also its nature as a substance, plant or animal, etc. The experiences of an elder are not science as a measure or precisely measurable, math or physics, etc. They are just metaphors or extrapolations of his/her empirical experiences as metaphors of senses just like the sciences are perceived, religion, astrology, or zodiac, etc. They are just the consequences of his/her life experiences as a remade nature, in each second/moment of existence, through memories, recollections or prints left to our humanoid nature that we are or in which we exist. Their experiences and metaphors which science is trying through perceptions (mathematical, physical, astronomical or astrophysical, etc) and its metaphors (religion, parapsychology, alchemy or zodiac, etc) to comprise, know or define nature and its virtual of illusions and shadows. Within the limits of our limited minds, judgments and reason. Even if we know that the present or remade nature is unlimited and conventional and beyond the conventions and conventional of any content or body, universe/entity or object/phenomena, etc.

                Perceived science starts from her utopic and illogical equal and unequal having as a priority contraries that “cancel each other”, unlike its metaphors which have as a priority the contraries which do not “cancel each other” of the nature that we are and in which we exist. That does not mean that religion is or can be separated from mathematics, astrophysics from astrology or alchemy from chemistry, etc. because everything is just an unconventional and dialectic/simultaneity of sequences and parts, by case. In no way are they just duality, association or interdisciplinarity, etc, which are just its particular cases.

                Mathematics or physics tell us that one minus one equals zero, which leads to the idea they “cancel each other”, justice tells us that a monetary compensation or one in nature can be equal to a handicap from an accident, etc. In essence that they “cancel each other”, or that they do not have as a consequence the making or transformation of the contents or bodies of nature which we are discussing, unlike the metaphors such as religion, zodiac, parapsychology, etc. The perceived sciences being of course illogical, absurd or “impossible”, by case, which do not even respect the principle of A. Lavoisier, limited to the chemical substance, the humane having in this case as a priority the contraries that “cancel each other”, as a perception of science, while the antihuman having the contraries that do not “cancel each other” as a metaphor of science. Each of them with its specific priority but both as a virtual of illusions and shadows of the nature of knowing as empiric or as experiences of the perfect/”imperfect” nature, by case. Knowing as nature with its virtual of illusions and shadows, fields or specific ideas, with contraries that do not “cancel each other”. Logical and perfect. Science through its content, knowledge and human/antihuman definite of contraries which “cancel each other” as an illogical and imperfect priority as absurd or “impossible”. Science being just illogical “imperfection” of the perfection of the logical paradox of nature with the priority of contraries that “cancel each other”. Even if the paradox and absurd follow through in any of their variants as simultaneity/dialectic and unconventional nature of sequences and parts, by case, with and without contraries which do and do not “cancel each other”. Where and when their dialectic simultaneity of unconventional sequences and pars, are or represent the perfect/”imperfect” of the forever/eternal becoming and transformation, which respect the principle of A. Lavoisier, in all its general and particular variants. Similar to the relation of the absolutely simple or conventionally generalized relativity but also its simultaneous/dialectic unconventional.                 We see nature not only as a collection of associated, dual or interdisciplinary objects, which need to be studied but also as a live, dynamic whole which reflects deeper thruths about existence. In other words one and the same thing that is compared, comparative and reported to unlimited marks, situations and systems of reference. Unlike science, in our philosophy, which is a strong instrument but limited to understanding as a meaning of the measurable aspects of the world – even if it is not the only why towards knowledge, comprise or definition of nature. Nature speaks through DNAs, patterns, cicles and relations, unraveling meaning not only through data, measure or measurables, absolutely/relative, compared, comparable or reported with mark, situations or systems of reference, limited to our capacities or to other contents and bodies, etc., by case. Beyond marks, situations and systems of reference there is their unlimited as reality or extranature, extralimited of any mark, situation or system of reference etc. Or the empiric which we live as experiences of our existence or of other contents and bodies, intuitions, instincts as metaphors, or extrapolation of measure and the measurable of our perceptions or of other contents as universe/entities. Our approach honors both the illogic of the absurd science as well as the the mystery of the paradox nature, the paradox with its logic and the absurd with its illogic, seeling the harmony between the illogical known and its logical known as an unknown or a known/unknown of nature. Both options as a perfect/”imperfect” of forever eternal becoming and transformation.       


Why this new approach?


The world is changing – fast. Traditional science often isolates phenomena in order to explain them, while the conventional philosophies, as well as the sciences, perceived or as metaphors, can overlook the tangible perspectives of empirical discoveries. Our new approach is formed from the need to reconnect the fragmented ways of knowledge towards its simultaneous/dialectic and unconventional ensemble, as sequences and parts of nature, which we are and in which we exist. It is an answer to the growing awareness of the fact the neither science by itself nor the abstract thinking can fully understand the complexity of life as an illogical and “imperfect” absurd of nature, on its logical paradox as harmony and normalcy. Like any limited which cannot know, comprise or define neither the unlimited of nature proper nor of the nature in which it exists. Even if beyond its limits it is unlimited. We got lost from nature, seeking the extreme limits of science as perfection or “imperfection” and not their harmony as a logical/illogical nature of the perfect/”imperfect” absurd/paradox, as their dialectic simultaneity of sequences and parts. Dialectic/simultaneity or unit, unique dimension or simultaneity, etc. and their dialectic as truth, revelation, truthfulness, etc. Unfortunately, extremes and extremism, even if only of science as perception or metaphor, inevitably lead to convulsions, riots or even wars, etc., in their search for the harmony and normalcy of contraries which do and do not “cancel each other” as nature or as logical/illogical, absurd/paradox.

                We believe that it’s time for a philosophy which integrates precision as absolute with the approximate of its relative, nature with its perspectives, facts and their perfect/”imperfect”, in the sense that the intellect integrates presence with their past and future etc. A philosophy which can be felt, lived or understood as meaning by any humanoid as man/antiman and human/antihuman of humanity which we are and in which we exist. A philosophy of philosophies or a king/queen of all our illusions and shadows as a virtual of nature which we are and in which we exist. This includes any sciences, as perception and metaphor, which are trying through their limited conventions to “reflect reality”, according to the classical definitions or nature and its extranature (reality), in the unconventional sense of non-nature. Non-nature or nature/extranature, with and without limits, exceptions, undetermined, well-defined constant or invariable entities, absurd or “impossible”, etc. With or without contraries that “cancel each other”. With contraries that “cancel each other” withing the limits of marks, situations and systems of reference with their specific opposite and contrary as a system. With contraries that do no “cancel each other” beyond marks, situations and systems of reference as a system, compared, comparative or reported with them. Where and when the sciences as perception are measure and measurables which prioritize the contraries which “cancel each other”, mathematics, physics, chemistry, astrophysics, metaphysics, etc. Unlike the metaphors of science, religion, parapsychology, zodiac, medium, telepathy, spiritism, astrology or witchcraft, etc., which prioritize the contraries which don’t “cancel each other”. Even if in both options there are sciences, some as perception and others as metaphor, each with its specific human/scientific, each of them are trying to comprise, know or define, through their specific conventions, nature and its reality (extranature).  In other words, it’s like democracy and dictatorship which are one and the same both having as a dialectic liberty/constraint. One gives priority to liberty as democracy the other to constraint as dictatorship, compared, comparative or reported with conventional marks situations and systems of reference and setting them as conditions of existence. Even if there is no democracy without dictatorship and the other way around, liberty without constraint and the other way as perfect/extraperfect nature, harmony or normalcy (as a situation in general), perfect/antiperfect one (system situation) or perfect/”imperfect” one (human/antihuman situation), by case. Just like space is a variable/constant and time a constant/variable due to their dialectical simultaneity as sequences and parts.

                By prioritizing the constant for space and of the variable for time, compared, comparative or reported with marks situations and systems of reference. Even if in essence they are just a constant/variable, beyond their conventional priority. Space, through the variable of its time, becomes variable/constant, time through the constant of its space as dialectic becomes constant/variable. In other words, one and the same or a work of nature, compared, comparative or reported with different marks situations and systems of reference. By knowing and understanding that there can be no convention, content or body, ets, without its opposite or contrary within the limits of marks, situations and systems of reference, even more as a system, human/antihuman system.

                This is not a rejection of science in the classical sense but only a rebalancing – one that reclaims nature both as subject of study or knowledge, as well as a source of wisdom or known, as an extrapolation of measure and their measurable. By doing so, we open or release space/time in order to better understand the meanings of nature and its extranature as reality. One in which people, humanity and science, with their virtual of illusions and shadows are not separated by the nature that they are and in which they exist. In which the opposite and its simultaneous/dialectic contrary of contraries which do and do not “cancel each other” coexist. As an expression of perfect/”imperfect” nature of the simultaneity/dialectic of unconventional sequences and parts of nature and its paradox/absurd, logical and illogical.

Given the conditions in which everything is a harmony and normality as paradox/absurd, perfection/”imperfect”, with contraries which do and do not “cancel each other”, including Unicity with its unicity, God with all His Gods, us, any content or body, etc, as part of them. In other words, any human or scientific formula, as perception/metaphor, is a constant through its equal and identical, even if nothing, nowhere, no place (no place, as unconventional) and never (never, as unconventional), as a paradox nature, does it exist as constant. From the speed of light to “pi” or to the constant of Kepler, etc, even more in the classical sense of the contraries that “cancel each other”. In neither of their variants, from quants to strings, atoms and molecules, contents or bodies, astrophysical or unconventional unicity, Unicity and its unicity, God and all His Gods, etc.

                Given the conditions in which us and any content or body, etc., are made up of parts or sequences of them and in turn we are part of other contents, bodies, unicity of Unicity, et., as simultaneous/dialectic and unconventional nature and reality (extranature) just like it is and exists including Unicity or God. A nonnature or nature/extranature, perfect/extraperfect, perfect/anitperfect and perfect/”imperfect”, by case, as forever and eternal becoming and transformation.