The Probable and Probability

I. The Probable and Probability

In other words, the probable and its dialectic as a ratio of probabilities of existence/nonexistence.
There are two variants of probability starting from its classical definition, respectively the formula for calculating probability:

p = (number of favorable cases) / (number of possible cases).

Where and when the favorable cases of existence are their possible as unit, unique dimension or simultaneity, etc. And possible are all the possible cases as their domain of definition. That is exactly what we say in the unconventional definition of probability and its probable. Starting from the generalized relation of the nature of any content or body, etc., with opposites that do and do not “cancel each other out.”

Limited to human or science, the mathematical formula of the existence of any unit,

1 = 01 × ∞1,

not only the mathematical formula limited to

1 = 0 × ∞

and indeterminate, due to the lack of specification of the nature of zero and infinity of that unit. A formula as a limited expression or projection, virtual of illusions and shadows, of the general relation of the nature of any content, body or entity/universe, etc. Knowing and understanding that a unit can be anything, from a quantum to an astrophysical unit and beyond them, etc. In the same/different instant/moment in which scientific, lay/theist formulas are limited to opposites that “cancel each other out,” while the similar relation as nature without limits, with and without opposites that “cancel each other out.”
We use expressions such as same/different or instant/moment, considering that everything is paradox/absurd as conventional and unconventional perfect/imperfect (conventional/extraconventional, conventional/anticonventional, or conventional/inconventional, as the case may be, instant/moment, where and when the instant has as dialectic place/time, and the moment as space/time as specific dialectic). In this situation, the formula becomes a relation of nature,

@sim/dialj ≅ @nj/ňj/ňj,

which is in fact a relation of simultaneous/dialectical and unconventional probability of that content.
That is, a relation as the probability of its unlimited appearance and disappearance. Where and when we have the probable

@nj ≅ ňj/ňj,

similar to the mathematical formula

1 = 01 × ∞1,

or

1 = 0 × ∞,

as the case may be.
…
Respectively, the favorable or possible of the simultaneous/dialectical content, the favorable as the unlimited small and “impossible,” the possible as perfection or unlimited great, of the existence of the content.
In the human/scientific case, zero or nothingness as favorable or “impossible,” one or infinity as possible of that unit. Impossible because zero and one are mathematical units that exist only through our nonexistent conventions or constants upon a perfect becoming and transformation. All the more as their mathematical indeterminate or zero probability and nothingness, which do not exist.

Knowing and understanding that from zero or nothingness as nonexistence, existence cannot be born, just as we or any content cannot be born from nonexistence, zero, or nothingness. Even more so nonexistence, zero, or nothingness in the classical sense as disappearance or constant nonexistence, since the paradox of becoming and nature does not allow constants or invariants or opposites that “cancel each other out,” even if they exist in the mind, judgment or reasonings of nature, as virtual, illusions and shadows, fields, thoughts, or ideas of it.

Which leads to the conclusion that everything is probability and probable as nature, contents or bodies of it, etc., considering that from zero or nothingness, as nonexistence, existence cannot be born. Where and when @nj and 1 are units, unique dimensions or simultaneities, and ňj/ňj and 01×∞1 are the dialectics of their specific probable. Some as unconventional, others as religion or mathematics, human/scientific or lay/theist, some with opposites that do and do not “cancel each other out,” others only with opposites that “cancel each other out.”

Mathematical Variants

1. Simplified variant:
In an urn there are five balls numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, and we seek the probable and the probability that one of them will be drawn. In this case, for ball 1 to be drawn as its probable, it is

1 = 01 × ∞1,

or limited to our example,

1 = 1/5 × 1/1/5 = 1/5 × 5,

where and when,
01 = 1/5
and
∞1 = 5.

In the sense of the classical definition of probability as probable, as a ratio between the number of favorable cases of occurrence (1) and the number of possible cases (5), (1) as favorable or unit, (5) as possible or the domain of definition of the occurrence or extraction. Otherwise (the unconventional of otherwise as otherwise/otherwise-other) said, between the axiom of the domain of definition as beginning (1) and its domain of definition, that is (5).
Similarly, the probable and the possible probability for their domain of definition or the number of possible cases as extraction of any ball from that domain of definition. That is,

∞1 = 1/1/5 = 5,

possible cases.

Respectively, the favorable or the possible of the simultaneous/dialectical content as probability of its appearance and disappearance.

The favorable as unlimited small and “impossible,” the possible as perfection or unlimited great of the existence of the content.

Fully respecting the classical formula of probability, which we call only the probable of the probability as unit, unique dimension, or simultaneity, etc.
Likewise for the other balls, that is,

2 = 02 × ∞2 = 1/5 × 5,
3 = 03 × ∞3 = 1/5 × 5,
4 = 04 × ∞4 = 1/5 × 5,
5 = 05 × ∞5 = 1/5 × 5,

the cases being equal and constant with opposites that “cancel each other out” but “impossible” as paradox or perfect nature. Beyond our mind, reason, judgments, and conventions, etc.
Where and when the probability of occurrence or existence of each ball is 1/5, and of their disappearance or nonexistence, their domain of definition 5, so that none is drawn — which is the total number of possible cases as the domain of definition of the extraction as existence, 5.

2. The second variant, or multiple probability as multiple probable, refers to a number of parliamentarians elected by a number of voters. Parliamentarians as elected, respectively a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, who are elected by a number of persons, for us 100 as sample, domain of definition or possible cases. In this case, each elected has his own specific probable, favorable, which fits within the total of 100 as total number of possible cases or domain of definition.
Of which 10 declare they choose a1, 20 a2, 25 a3, 30 a4 and 15 a5, under the condition in which a1 has as favorable number of voters in relation to the total number of voters his probable as 10/100, a2 20/100, a3 25/100, a4 30/100 and a5 15/100. Similar to the formula presented above, as a product between the two probabilities, that is, their probable is:

a1 = 0a1 × ∞a1 = 10/100 × 100/10,
a2 = 0a2 × ∞a2 = 20/100 × 100/20,
a3 = 0a3 × ∞a3 = 25/100 × 100/25,
a4 = 0a4 × ∞a4 = 30/100 × 100/30,
a5 = 0a5 × ∞a5 = 15/100 × 100/15.

Respectively, the probable of election, appearance or existence of an elected as follows:

a1 = 0a1 = 10/100,
a2 = 0a2 = 20/100,
a3 = 0a3 = 25/100,
a4 = 0a4 = 30/100,
a5 = 0a5 = 15/100,

and of his certain disappearance or nonexistence:

a1 = ∞a1 = 100/10,
a2 = ∞a2 = 100/20,
a3 = ∞a3 = 100/25,
a4 = ∞a4 = 100/30,
a5 = ∞a5 = 100/15.

One the inverse of the other, one as existence, the other as its certain nonexistence, and the product encompasses or defines that unit.
Where and when the probable and the probability of existence are never, nowhere, no time, zero or nothing in the classical sense, but an infinitely small however large or small it may be by convention. Otherwise, it would be as if the elected were a result of the nonexistence of the election.
A condition in which the probability of the appearance of the probable is the inverse of the probability of its disappearance, both fully respecting the definition of classical but also unconventional probability as a ratio between the number of favorable cases and the number of possible cases, all or domain of definition, etc. Or otherwise said, of the favorable and antifavorable cases in the classical sense. Not possible, because the passible of their nonexistence is their infinity or unlimitedness, as the case may be, not only their human/scientific, lay/theist possible.
In conclusion, everything is probability and probable as nature, contents or bodies of it, etc., but especially virtual of illusions and shadows as probable and probability, considering that from zero or nothingness, as nonexistence, existence cannot be born, in the classical and unconventional sense.