The Philosophy of Nature: The Unconventional Reflection of Reality

Why this new approach?

The world is changing – rapidly. But the world does not mean the nature that we are and in which we exist; the world is our humanoid vision of the nature that we are and in which we exist. Traditional science not only isolates bodies, objects, and phenomena in order to explain them. Because of our humanoid limitations, it also limits their very meanings and significances through the conventions of our dreams in a waking state or in sleep. While conventional philosophies, like the sciences, perceived or metaphorical, may overlook the tangible perspectives of empirical discoveries. Our new approach arises from the need to reconnect fragmented modes of knowledge toward its entirety as the unconventional of nature. Under the conditions in which everything is philosophy or merely a humanoid vision as a science that “reflects reality.” Any science, metaphor, or perception attempts to “reflect reality” through its conventions, even if only as world and not as nature or reality, but merely as a projection of nature or metaphors of reality. As a vision of the world about the nature that we are and in which we exist, or as metaphors of reality as extranature. It is a response to the growing awareness that neither science alone nor abstract thought can fully understand the complexity of life as a logical and unlimited paradox of nature within our humanoid limits. Seeking the extreme limits of science as perception or metaphors and not their harmony as the logical nature-normality of the perfect/“imperfect” paradox. Harmony as balance/imbalance and their normality as harmony and normality, etc. Unfortunately, extremes and their extremism, even if only humanoid, inevitably lead to convulsions, revolts, or even wars, etc. In the greed of seeking the harmony and normality of opposites that both do and do not “cancel each other out” as perfect/imperfect and logical/illogical nature, as the case may be.

We believe that the time has come for a philosophy that integrates precision with perspective, facts with meaning, and intellect with presence. A philosophy as the king/queen of all philosophies, including sciences as philosophy that attempt through their conventions to “reflect reality,” according to classical definitions. With or without limits, exceptions, indeterminacy, well-defined entities, constants or invariants, absurdity or the “impossible,” etc. Where and when the sciences as perception, metaphor, or mathematical extrapolation, physics, chemistry, astrophysics, metaphysics, etc., possess their own specific known, content, and defined as perception, measure, or the measurable. Unlike the sciences as extrapolation or metaphor such as religion, parapsychology, zodiac, mediumship, telepathy, spiritism, astrology, or witchcraft, etc., which possess their own specific known, content, and defined as metaphor or extrapolation of perceptions, measure, and measurability.

This is not a rejection of science, in the classical sense, but only a rebalancing – one that reclaims nature both as a subject of study or knowledge and as a source of wisdom or the known as an extrapolation of the sciences of nature. In doing so, we open space/time for a richer understanding of nature and its extranature as reality. One in which people, humanity, and science, as a virtuality of illusions and shadows or dreams in a waking state and in sleep, are not separated from the nature that they are and in which they exist. They are the opposite and the contrary, simultaneous/dialectical and unconventional, that both do and do not “cancel each other out,” like any harmony and normality, perfect/“imperfect,” of the simultaneous/dialectical nature of unconventional sequences and parts of nature and of its paradox/absurd.

Everything and all things are a harmony and normality as paradox/absurd, perfection/“imperfection,” with opposites that both do and do not “cancel each other out,” even if we or others cannot encompass, know, or define the understanding of their meaning.

Any scientific formula is a constant even though nothing, nowhere, no place, and no time, as paradox nature, contains constants, from the speed of light to “pi” or Kepler’s constant, etc. Nor is there equality or identity in the classical sense, nor in any of their variants, from quanta and strings, atoms and molecules, contents or bodies, astrophysical or unconventional unique, etc., of nature as paradox. Unlike their absurd, that is humanoid, compared, comparative or reported with marks, situations and systems of reference. Given the condition in which A. Lavoisier is telling us, through his principle, in a simple or generalized way that, in nature, nothing is lost, nothing is gained, everything becomes and is transformed, perfectly/imperfect as everlasting and eternal.