Neutrosophy as reflection of reality

From the same cycle “reality and its unconventional reflection”, published in 2012, it is the third book, after the collection of poems “The Unconventional and I” (2009) republished as “Unproven Perfect” (2025), “Freedom/Constraint As Reflection of Reality”, “Neutrosophy As Reflection of Reality” (2011), then Existence/Form/Spirit as “Form/Existence/Spirit” and “Transformation/Space/Time”, 2012, and in 2014 the novel “The Anonymous Ones”. The present book being the only collaboration with professor Smarandache Florentin, a celebrity in the field of mathematics but also of paradoxism for which he was proposed for the Nobel prize in 2010 and who is excited by what we have written in our collaboration, saying that the philosophy presented is a special one.

In this context we are speaking of a book that is trying to introduce us to the universe of reality from beyond the nature that we perceive through perceptions, extrapolations of them or our metaphors. These take us to the paradox and perfection of reality, intuited or instinctual, beyond the perceptions and extrapolations of our conventions limited to nature or extranature as reality, perfect, anti-perfect or just its “imperfect”, human, humanoid or scientific. Compared, comparative and reported with marks, situations and systems of reference. Through similitude with the neutrosophy of mr. F. Smarandache which starts from a neutral <Neut-A> which gravitates between an <Anti-A> and an <A>, constant and invariable. Unfortunately, his philosophy is just the limited variant of neutrosophy in which <Anti-A> and <A> are conventions compared and reported to an A as its identical, invariable and constant. Compared, comparative and reported with mathematical marks, situations and systems of references. In nature beyond marks, situations and systems of reference but also beyond the mathematical senses, there is no equal and identical, even more contraries that cancel each other. The way mathematics understands the meanings of the world and its nature. Mathematics, just like any science, perceived (religion, astrology or alchemy, etc.), extrapolated or metaphor (mathematics, physics, chemistry or astronomy, etc.), start from the utopic assumption of equal and identical that don’t exist beyond our mind, reason and judgements. In their absence, science of any nature does not exist or would not have appeared, being just sophism or utopia, as measure or precise measurable. With contraries that “Cancel each other”, even if all sciences also have their variants that don’t “cancel each other, the undetermined, likeness, unequal or random, etc.”

Beyond these contraries that “cancel each other”, through their equal and identical, as <Anti-A> and <A>, positive and negative or good and bad, etc., by case, exist in nature and their variants which do not “cancel each other”. Our equal and identical human, humanoid and scientific, represent the “imperfect” world or just antiperfect including that of <A> and <Anti-A>, but beyond them there is a known of the perfect nature with contraries that do and do not “cancel each other” and which lead to the infinite and unlimited, our existence and theirs and nature and reality, perfect/anitperfect or just perfect/imperfect, of them, by case. Nature with contraries which “cancel each other” can’t and does not lead to becoming or transformation that is infinite or unlimited, eternal or endless, cancelling each other. The one that does not “cancel each other” moves on further in the infinite or unlimited by case.

In order to understand the importance of the work from the two authors, one known and one unknown in the classical or unconventional sense, we make available for you the presentations of the two authors of the book.